Zamann Pharma Support logo

Siedlerstraße 7 | 68623 Lampertheim, Germany

info@zamann-pharma.com

Request an appointment now

How We Standardized Multi-Site GMP Training Records in Veeva

Managing Multi-Site GMP Training Records became complex during a global GxP system rollout.

One pharmaceutical company delivered central online training across several sites. The training ran smoothly, but the documentation did not.

Each site required different evidence. One used signed attendance sheets. Another required individual certificates. A third accepted Teams screenshots and email confirmation. Meanwhile, another maintained an Excel training log.

As a result, each session created extra work. Participant lists had to be separated by site. Templates had to be updated. Signatures needed follow-up. Records also had to reach the correct local contact.

The company had training records, but no consistent training record process.

This also created a compliance concern. 21 CFR 211.25 requires appropriate personnel training. EU GMP Chapter 2 requires training programmes and records. In addition, ICH Q10 links training and knowledge management to the pharmaceutical quality system.

Electronic records also bring 21 CFR Part 11 expectations, including validated systems, audit trails, and unique user credentials.

Therefore, the company needed one controlled process without losing site-level visibility.

Our team standardized the process by moving training delivery, attendance, and electronic sign-off into Veeva.

Challenges Faced

A detailed GAP analysis in Quality Management Systems is essential for identifying process deficiencies effectively.
  • Different Record Formats Across Sites:Each site required different training evidence.
  • High Manual Workload:The team managed site records, signatures, and distribution manually.
  • Higher Error Risk: Manual handling increased the risk of wrong templates, missing attendees, incorrect dates, and incorrect session titles.
  • Fragmented Training Evidence: Different filing practices meant training records could sit across several local storage locations.
  • Inconsistent Inspection Evidence:Training evidence varied by site.
  • Limited Global Visibility: There was no single view showing who had completed training across all sites.
  • Poor Scalability: Every local format added more work, making global system rollouts and updates harder to manage.

Zamann Pharma Support’s Approach

  • Centralize Training in Veeva: Our team moved training delivery and documentation into one centralized, validated system.
  • Use Veeva Classrooms: Each training session was created as a Classroom instead of producing separate site-specific records.
  • Enroll Participants Across Sites: Users from multiple sites joined the appropriate classroom within the same system.
  • Capture Attendance Centrally: Attendance was recorded directly in Veeva instead of recreated after each session.
  • Use Electronic Sign-Off: Participants completed electronic sign-off within the system rather than on scattered paper forms.
  • Create One Training Repository: All training evidence remained in one queryable system.
  • Maintain Site-Level Visibility: Records could still be filtered by training, date, site, or individual user.
  • Support GMP Record Controls: The approach included consistent event setup, electronic sign-off, system validation, access controls, audit trails, and data retention considerations.

Results Achieved

  • Lower Administrative Workload: The trainer created one classroom per session instead of several different record formats.
  • Removed Wrong-Site Record Risk: The centralized system removed the risk of sending one site’s documentation to another site.
  • Centralized Training Evidence: Training evidence moved into one system instead of multiple local formats and storage locations.
  • Faster Audit Retrieval: QA could filter records by training, date, site, or user.
  • Part-11-Ready Records: The system supported electronic training records and electronic sign-off in a controlled environment.
  • More Consistent GMP Documentation: The standardized process created a clearer and more consistent training record across the multi-site rollout.
Laboratory
Digital GMP software systems with audit trail monitoring, lifecycle validation controls, and risk-based data governance supporting inspection readiness.
Services

Digital Solutions for GMP Operations

We support pharmaceutical teams in implementing, maintaining, and optimizing GMP software, data management systems, and computerized workflows that strengthen compliance, data integrity, and operational efficiency.

Read More

Contact Us

Need help? Don't hesitate to get in touch
Zamann pharma support is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy, and we’ll use your personal information to administer your account and to provide the products and services you requested from us.

FAQ

1. How can multi-site GMP training records be standardized in Veeva?

A company can create each training session as a Veeva Classroom and enroll participants from relevant sites into the same event. Attendance and electronic sign-off can then remain within the centralized system. This replaces separate site-specific attendance sheets, certificates, screenshots, and Excel logs with one queryable training record source.

2. What controls are important for electronic GMP training records under 21 CFR Part 11?

The source identifies validated systems, unique user credentials, secure audit trails, electronic signatures, and timestamps as important controls. The training system should also address access controls and data retention. These controls help support trustworthy electronic GMP training records and signatures.

3. How does centralizing GMP training records improve multi-site audit readiness?

Centralization places training evidence in one system instead of multiple local formats and storage locations. In this case, records could be filtered by training, date, site, or user. Therefore, QA could retrieve evidence consistently while maintaining visibility across individual sites and the wider rollout.