Siedlerstraße 7 | 68623 Lampertheim, Germany

info@zamann-pharma.com

This article explains how regulators assess the Pharmacovigilance System Master File during inspections, where governance gaps create audit findings, and why clear accountability, traceability, and inspection readiness determine long-term regulatory confidence.
This article explains how PSURs support regulatory assessment through structured benefit–risk evaluation, safety data integration, and inspection readiness, helping organizations maintain consistent safety reasoning and meet evolving regulatory expectations across post-marketing reporting cycles.
This article examines how artificial intelligence supports drug safety activities, from adverse event detection to safety data analytics, while regulatory oversight, human decision authority, and clear AI governance frameworks remain central to compliant pharmacovigilance operations.
This article explores pharmacovigilance as a structured safety governance system that integrates safety data, regulatory oversight, and decision accountability. It explains how governance-driven models improve inspection readiness, strengthen regulatory trust, and support consistent post-marketing safety decisions across the product lifecycle.
Purified Water systems seldom fail due to equipment; they decline silently through biofilm formation, flawed loop design, and absent microbial trending. In a project at a South American pharmaceutical company we found significant microbial deviations with no investigations or trending
During a PW validation for a South American pharma manufacturer, the team found solid equipment but no meaningful risk assessment. Parameters were adopted without justification and worst-case conditions were not challenged. Validations were paperwork-only, leading to rework, inspection findings, delays,
A Pharma company’s purified water (PW) system remained officially validated, but after three years without reassessment or maintenance it drifted out of its validated state. Lack of periodic requalification, preventive maintenance, and trending led to unpredictable performance and increased risk
During a LabWare LIMS 8.0 implementation at a Japanese pharma site, validation was delayed not by the system but by users modifying approved Excel test templates. Despite training and procedures, changes to formatting, formulas, and columns prevented uploads to ALM,
Zamann Pharma Support found that CSV failures often stem not from technical issues but from weak Quality Management Systems. At a German site, gaps in QA structure, SOPs, training, and IT governance undermined validation efforts. Without defined ownership, integrated SOPs,
Many facilities run modern digital lines alongside paper-based ones, forcing experts to work across two incompatible systems. This creates hidden costs, delays in investigations, training burdens, and increased data integrity risk. The article outlines where misalignment appears and offers a