Siedlerstraße 7 | 68623 Lampertheim, Germany

info@zamann-pharma.com

Drug Product Risk Assessment De-Risking Using Nitrosamine Questionnaire Approach

A pharmaceutical company approached Zamann Pharma Support because they needed a cost-effective and compliant strategy to manage nitrosamine risk assessment for their drug products. The company faced increasing regulatory pressure from FDA, EMA, and ICH M7 expectations. At the same time, they needed to avoid excessive analytical testing costs across multiple products and batches.

Therefore, Zamann Pharma Support proposed a structured nitrosamine questionnaire integrated into the Drug Product Risk Assessment (DPRA) process. The goal was to create a scientifically justified, regulator-ready approach that could identify true nitrosamine risks, reduce unnecessary testing, and support compliance through clear documentation and targeted decision-making.

Challenges Faced

A detailed GAP analysis in Quality Management Systems is essential for identifying process deficiencies effectively.
  • Regulatory Pressure: Regulatory pressure required compliance with FDA, EMA, and ICH M7 nitrosamine expectations, as weak or incomplete risk assessments could trigger inspection or submission issues.
  • High Testing Costs: Routine nitrosamine testing across all products and batches created significant financial pressure, especially for products with low theoretical risk.
  • Complex Risk Evaluation: Nitrosamine formation is influenced by multiple factors including amine presence, nitrite exposure, acidic conditions, packaging, and storage, requiring a structured, science-based evaluation.
  • Cross-Functional Data Collection: Key data was distributed across manufacturing, formulation, suppliers, analytical teams, and QA, making consistent and traceable data collection challenging.
  • Time-Sensitive Compliance Needs: The organization needed a rapid assessment process to support internal timelines while maintaining regulatory readiness.
     

Zamann Pharma Support’s Approach

  • Project Initialization: Zamann Pharma Support initiated the project through cross-functional discussions with QA, RA, manufacturing, formulation, and analytical teams. The team then reviewed the existing DPRA process and defined the full scope of the nitrosamine risk evaluation.
  • Questionnaire Design: Zamann Pharma Support developed a structured questionnaire for risk-based nitrosamine assessment. API composition, excipients, manufacturing conditions, packaging, and storage were reviewed to identify nitrosamine risks.
  • Key Topics Evaluated: The assessment focused on secondary and tertiary amines in APIs, excipients, and intermediates. It also evaluated nitrosating agents and critical process conditions like heat, acidity, packaging, and storage.
  • Structured Risk Evaluation: Each response was used to classify product risk in a structured way. Low-risk products required minimal testing, while partial or high-risk signals triggered targeted analytical testing.
  • Documentation & Compliance Support: All questionnaire results were stored in the DPRA system for inspection readiness. Zamann Pharma Support also ensured alignment across QA, RA, and technical teams with controlled documentation workflows.
  • Support for Implementation: Zamann Pharma Support provided guidance for integrating the questionnaire into routine quality and regulatory processes. In addition, the team supported internal alignment between QA, RA, MSAT, and analytical functions.

Results Achieved

  • Reduced Unnecessary Testing: The questionnaire-based approach helped the company avoid excessive nitrosamine testing for low-risk products while maintaining scientific justification.
  • Improved Risk Visibility: The structured assessment allowed teams to identify true nitrosamine risks related to APIs, excipients, manufacturing conditions, and packaging systems.
  • Regulatory Alignment: The final DPRA approach aligned with FDA, EMA, and ICH M7 expectations for risk-based nitrosamine control strategies.
  • Better Resource Allocation: The company focused analytical testing only on products with identified risk factors, which improved operational efficiency and reduced testing costs.
  • Enhanced Documentation Readiness: Centralized questionnaire records and DPRA integration improved inspection readiness and strengthened traceable compliance documentation.
  • Faster Decision-Making: The organization achieved quicker risk evaluation and more efficient product review timelines through standardized assessment criteria.
Laboratory
Pharmaceutical quality team reviewing nitrosamines risk assessment documentation aligned with ICH M7 and current regulatory compliance requirements
Services

Nitrosamines Regulatory Compliance

We assist pharmaceutical teams in assessing and managing nitrosamines risks by aligning processes with ICH M7 requirements and current regulatory expectations.

Contact Us

Need help? Don't hesitate to get in touch
Zamann pharma support is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy, and we’ll use your personal information to administer your account and to provide the products and services you requested from us.

FAQ

1. How can manufacturers reduce nitrosamine testing costs without creating compliance risks?

Manufacturers can reduce testing costs by using a scientifically justified questionnaire within the DPRA process. If the assessment confirms the absence of amines, nitrites, and reactive process conditions, companies may justify a lower testing strategy while remaining aligned with FDA and EMA expectations.

 

2. What conditions usually trigger targeted nitrosamine testing in finished drug products?

Targeted testing usually becomes necessary when the formulation includes secondary or tertiary amines, nitrite exposure, acidic manufacturing conditions, reactive packaging materials, or storage environments that may support nitrosamine formation.

 

3. Why do regulators expect traceable nitrosamine questionnaires during inspections?

Regulators expect traceable documentation because questionnaire data supports the scientific rationale behind risk-based decisions. Clear records demonstrate that the company evaluated APIs, excipients, manufacturing steps, packaging, and storage conditions systematically within the DPRA lifecycle.